Home » Patent » Claim Construction » Judge Hart Adopts All of NanoChem Solutions Proposed Claim Constructions

Judge Hart Adopts All of NanoChem Solutions Proposed Claim Constructions

Nanochem Solutions v. Global Green Products, 10-CV-5686, Slip. Op. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2013)(Hart)

The parties were seeking to construe seven separate claim terms.  For example, the parties disputed the proper construction of the term “heating powdered L-aspartic acid to at least 370 degrees F to initiate a condensation reaction.”  While the use or non-use of a catalyst was not mentioned in the specification elsewhere in the intrinsic record, Global Green Products attempted to have this term construed as requiring the process occur without the use of a chemical catalyst.  Similarly, Global Green Products sought to have “indirectly heated plate drier” construed as the exact plate drier disclosed in a particular patents specification.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Judge Hart chose to adopt NanoChem Solutions proposed constructions for every one of the disputed terms.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: